Gilles Arnaud Bailly vs Martin Van Der Meerschen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Jun at 03:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Arnaud Bailly vs M. Van Der Meerschen

BEL
0
Win
Played
1
Win

BEL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Bailly 0 - 1 Meerschen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gilles Arnaud Bailly winning 0 and Martin Van Der Meerschen winning 2. The last match between Martin Van Der Meerschen and Gilles Arnaud Bailly was at the M25 Brussels, 26-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Martin Van Der Meerschen getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bailly | 0 |
| Meerschen | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Brussels(06-26-25)
G. A. Bailly vs M. V. D. Meerschen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $23,415 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.73% (123-70) | Career Total W/L | 53.33% (96-84) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. A. Bailly vs M. V. D. Meerschen Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In recent form, Meerschen has a slight edge, winning 43.04% of second serve points compared to Bailly's 40.2%. Does this indicate a crucial advantage? Yes, given its high correlation to predicting match outcomes.
- Return Game Stats: Meerschen again comes out on top, securing 47.93% of points on opponents' second serves, while Bailly captures 44.42%. For first serve returns, Meerschen leads 33.36% to Bailly's 28.36%. This pattern suggests an edge in return games for Meerschen.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Bailly has shown slightly better performance saving breakpoints at 46.09% compared to Meerschen's 44.74%, indicating Bailly's adeptness in high-pressure situations.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Bailly edges out with a win rate of 64.71%, while Meerschen holds 62.3%. This suggests Bailly's recent form is slightly stronger in terms of overall victories.
- Best Surface Analysis: Meerschen performs best on clay (56% win rate), whereas Bailly excels on hard courts (69% win rate). Could surface play a decisive role? Yes, especially if the match is on a hard court, favoring Bailly.
- Player Level: Both players have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, with Bailly having a marginally better win rate (64.62%) versus Meerschen (62.3%). Experience and performance context are critical in evaluating their potential.
- Opponent Quality Stats: Meerschen has faced higher-ranked opponents (average rank of 276.49) compared to Bailly (average rank of 353.24), implying Meerschen’s exposure to tougher competition.
- Deciding Set Performance: Bailly has a slight edge, winning 54% of deciding sets compared to Meerschen's 52% over the past 12 months, indicating resilience in tight matches.
- Breakpoint Conversion: In recent times, Meerschen has converted 41.96% of breakpoints, while Bailly stands at 39.27%. This suggests Meerschen may have a slight advantage in critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (June 26, 2025, UTC):
As we anticipate this upcoming tennis clash, the statistical comparisons provide insight into each player's potential to seize victory. Meerschen's notable performance in return games and breakpoint conversion could serve as crucial factors in turning the match in his favor.
Meerschen has demonstrated consistency in second serve performance compared to Bailly, which could confer a considerable benefit during pivotal moments. Simultaneously, Bailly's advantage in coping with pressure via his adept breakpoint defense indicates potential resilience in crucial situations.
While both players have experienced success against varying levels of competition, Meerschen edges slightly due to having faced higher-ranked opponents, which may have better prepared him for this encounter. However, Bailly's superior record on hard surfaces, if applicable, could challenge Meerschen’s tactics.
Considering the highlighted statistics and comparative analysis, Meerschen appears to hold a slightly stronger prospect of securing a win in this matchup.
Gilles Arnaud Bailly vs Martin Van Der Meerschen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. A. Bailly vs M. V. D. Meerschen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 4 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:19:26 | Average Match Time | 1:19:26 |
| 54% (27/50) | 1st Serve % | 53% (23/43) |
| 52% (14/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (17/23) |
| 39% (9/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 70% (14/20) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 28% (12/43) | Return Points Win % | 54% (27/50) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. A. Bailly Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
F | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | ||
SF | W | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
M. V. D. Meerschen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 7-6(2) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 3-0 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 3-6 6-3 | ||

G. A. Bailly vs M. V. D. Meerschen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.73% (123/70) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.33% (96/84) |
| 61.88% (263/162) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.57% (215/194) |
| 54.85% (2160/1778) | Games Win/Loss | 50.83% (1982/1917) |
| 72.55% (37/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.78% (20/21) |
| 63.49% (80/46) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.30% (73/59) |
| 37.50% (6/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 288 | Aces Total | 252 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 290 | Total Double Faults | 351 |
| 1:46:15 | Average Match Time | 1:17:13 |
| 451.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 346.12 |
| 62% (7371/11859) | 1st Serve % | 66% (6007/9139) |
| 65% (4813/7371) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (3799/6007) |
| 51% (2270/4488) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1540/3132) |
| 49% (687/1411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (444/959) |
| 44% (5253/11931) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3800/9062) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.74% (11/16) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.95% (106/50) | Futures W/L | 53.33% (96/84) |
| 64% (122/191) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (93/177) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 73% (33/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (31/48) |
| 56% (23/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (24/48) |
| 92% (124/114) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (96/81) |
| 8% (124/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (96/15) |
| 13% (69/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (84/15) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
